Medical Error Disclosure: An Entrustable Professional Activity During an Objective Standardized Clinical Examination for Clerkship Students.

Introduction: Most health care providers will be involved in a medical error during their careers. It is critical that future physicians receive formal training on error disclosure. Methods: We designed a formative skills-based objective standardized clinical exam (OSCE) for fourth-year medical students to assess competence in disclosing an error during a required entrustable professional activity. Faculty observed the encounter and completed a checklist evaluating students' performance in communication skills and content knowledge. Students received immediate formative feedback. They then participated in a facilitated case-based experience, discussed the critical elements of disclosure, utilized role-play to reinforce skills, and reflected on self-care practices. Finally, students completed a survey evaluating their perception of the OSCE's impact on their disclosure knowledge, skills, and attitudes. Results: Ninety-two students participated in the OSCE. Of those, 67 (73%) completed a retrospective pre/post survey assessing their disclosure knowledge, skills, and attitudes. Forty-one (62%) did not identify the error. Students who identified the error (26, 39%) were more likely to use the two-patient identifier than students who did not identify the error, χ2(1) = 13.3, p < .001. Self-reported comfort and confidence in disclosure improved, as did self-care practices (ps ≤ .005). Discussion: Students agreed that health care providers should disclose an error and know how to do so. Student self-reported comfort in disclosure and knowledge of how to disclose and how to report an error all improved following the OSCE and structured debrief. The OSCE and case-based experience can be adapted for implementation in curricula about error disclosure.

Developing Clinician-Educators: a Qualitative Analysis of Structured Reflections from Participatory Teaching in the Final Year in an Integrated Medical School Program.

Objective: This study aimed to describe fourth-year medical students' experiences, recorded and tracked in structured reflective teaching logs (RTLs), as participants in a year-long longitudinal medical student-as-teacher elective. Methods: Thirteen (13) participants from two medical student-as-teacher elective cohorts completed 20 contact hours of self-selected teaching. Participants chose three different learning environments spanning the first 3 years of the medical school curriculum. Reflections were entered into an online spreadsheet with guided prompts (RTL). Open-ended text in the RTLs was analyzed using an inductive qualitative research approach. Open coding was applied across all meaningful segments of text, identifying themes that were validated internally with three co-authors and one methodology expert without formal program involvement. Results: Narratives revealed detailed descriptions and reflections of participant experiences. Analysis revealed eight themes: (1) Joy of Teaching; (2) Teaching Effectiveness; (3) Feedback; (4) Effective Patient-Physician Communication; (5) Assessment; (6) Differential Diagnosis Development; (7) Standardized Case Development; and (8) Training for Teaching in Residency. Conclusion: Fourth-year medical student participants in a longitudinal medical student-as-teacher elective effectively used RTLs from participatory teaching to help facilitate their own development as clinician-educators. Themes identified in RTLs reflect students' awareness of teaching skill requirements and readiness for the next workplace, residency. Informed by situativity theory, formal teaching opportunities in authentic learning environments bestow students with critical formative teaching experience and awareness of the roles as clinician-educators during their undergraduate years.

Implementation and Assessment of Mentoring and Professionalism in Training (MAP-IT): A Humanistic Curriculum as a Tool to Address Burnout in Surgical Residents.

OBJECTIVE: Mentoring and Professionalism in Training (MAP-IT), a humanistic mentorship program, has demonstrated positive impact in non-surgical fields. This study assesses the feasibility of implementing MAP-IT in surgical residency and adapts MAP-IT to include residents-as-teachers (RAT). We hypothesize that MAP-IT will benefit surgical residents by building humanistic teaching skills, increasing resilience, reducing burnout, and improving connectedness. DESIGN: MAP-IT was implemented monthly during protected educational time. Faculty surgeons who had previously completed MAP-IT served as facilitators. Small groups consisted of 12 trainees, two faculty facilitators, and one resident facilitator. Each session comprised 60 minutes of reflection, readings, and discussion surrounding humanistic mentoring skills. The Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS), Connor Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), and Humanistic Teaching Practices Effectiveness Questionnaire (HTPE) were administered before and after participation in MAP-IT. Qualitative interviews and surveys assessed residents' perspectives of the MAP-IT program. SETTING: MAP-IT was implemented at Northwell-North Shore/LIJ in Manhasset, NY in a general surgery residency program hosted by two tertiary care hospitals within a large health system. PARTICIPANTS: 55 residents participated as learners, five residents served as resident-facilitators, and 10 surgical faculty served as paired-facilitators of the MAP-IT course. RESULTS: 31.6% of residents had participated in a reflective medicine curriculum prior to MAP-IT, and these residents reported greater resilience and less burnout. This disparity was eliminated after participation in MAP-IT. Frequency of burnout was reduced from 64.1% to 46.1% after MAP-IT participation. Post-program, residents reported greater effectiveness in humanistic teaching practices when compared to baseline assessments. Quantitative and qualitative feedback demonstrated that MAP-IT was well received by resident participants and addressed a gap in their surgical training. CONCLUSIONS: A humanistic mentorship program involving RAT can be effectively implemented in surgical residency, is well-received by residents, and addresses a need surgical training by building skills and improving resident well-being.

A Scoping Review of Health Care Faculty Mentorship Programs in Academia: Implications for Program Design, Implementation, and Outcome Evaluation.

INTRODUCTION: Formal mentoring programs have direct benefits for academic health care institutions, but it is unclear whether program designs use recommended components and whether outcomes are being captured and evaluated appropriately. The goal of this scoping review is to address these questions. METHODS: We completed a literature review using a comprehensive search in SCOPUS and PubMed (1998-2019), a direct solicitation for unpublished programs, and hand-searched key references, while targeting mentor programs in the United States, Puerto Rico, and Canada. After three rounds of screening, team members independently reviewed and extracted assigned articles for 40 design data items into a comprehensive database. RESULTS: Fifty-eight distinct mentoring programs were represented in the data set. The team members clarified specific mentor roles to assist the analysis. The analysis identified mentoring program characteristics that were properly implemented, including identifying program goals, specifying the target learners, and performing a needs assessment. The analysis also identified areas for improvement, including consistent use of models/frameworks for program design, implementation of mentor preparation, consistent reporting of objective outcomes and career satisfaction outcomes, engagement of program evaluation methods, increasing frequency of reports as programs as they mature, addressing the needs of specific faculty groups (eg, women and minority faculty), and providing analyses of program cost-effectiveness in relation to resource allocation (return on investment). CONCLUSION: The review found that several mentor program design, implementation, outcome, and evaluation components are poorly aligned with recommendations, and content for URM and women faculty members is underrepresented. The review should provide academic leadership information to improve these discrepancies.

A multisite randomized trial of implicit versus explicit modeling in clinical teaching.

PURPOSE: Faculty modeling of desired behaviors has historically been a part of the apprenticeship model of clinical teaching, yet little is known about best practices for modeling. This study compared the educational impact of implicitly versus explicitly modeled communication skills among U.S. medical students. METHOD: Fourth-year medical students from six U.S. academic medical centers were randomly assigned one simulated clinical encounter in which faculty provided either implicit or explicit modeling of important communication skills. Outcomes were assessed by electronic surveys immediately before and after the simulations. Students were blinded to the purpose of the study. RESULTS: Students in the explicit arm were more likely to correctly cite two of the three key specific communication elements modeled by faculty: deliberate body position (53.3% vs. 18.6%, p < 0.001) and summarizing patient understanding (62.2% vs. 11.6%, p < 0.001). More students in the explicit study arm reported faculty 'demonstrated a key behavior that they wanted me to be able to perform in the future' (93.2% versus 62.8%, p = 0.002). Participating faculty stated they would modify their teaching approach in response to their experiences in the study. CONCLUSIONS: In a multi-center randomized trial, explicit faculty role-modeling led to greater uptake of communication knowledge, greater recognition of skills, and a greater sense that faculty expected these skills to be adopted by students. These results must be considered in the context, however, of a simulated environment and a short timeframe for assessing learning with students who volunteered for a simulated experience.

Interprofessional Leadership Development: Role of Emotional Intelligence and Communication Skills Training.

Introduction: Among the many skills required for leading interprofessional health care teams, emotional intelligence and communication skills are critical to building professionalism, establishing patient trust, and providing optimal patient care. Nonetheless, these skills are often overlooked in medical training. We implemented a 2.5-hour workshop for interprofessional trainees to self-assess, reflect, and apply their emotional intelligence and communication skills. Methods: Participants were interprofessional trainees, including internal medicine residents, medical students, and graduate students in clinical pharmacy, physician assistant, and health psychology training programs. The workshop consisted of reflective activities to self-assess emotional intelligence and communication styles; a didactic presentation focused on leadership, emotional intelligence, and communication styles; and a teamwork activity to apply emotional intelligence and communication skills. Results: Forty-four trainees participated in this workshop. After the workshop, trainees reported increased knowledge about positive strategies to communicate with team members, felt more comfortable working with other professionals to encourage positive team dynamics, and were more prepared to encourage leadership in their interprofessional teams. Examination of learner evaluations suggested that residents endorsed higher mean ratings than the other learner groups in knowledge attainment (p = .02) and meeting all learners' needs (p = .01). Discussion: This workshop enhanced our trainees' self-reported comfort, awareness, and preparedness regarding using emotional intelligence and communication strategies. An interprofessional approach can be beneficial for leadership training in the health professions.

The Learning Loop: Conceptualizing Just-in-Time Faculty Development.

BACKGROUND: As technology advances, the gap between learning and doing continues to close-especially for frontline academic faculty and clinician educators. For busy clinician faculty members, it can be difficult to find time to engage in skills and professional development. Competing interests between clinical care and various forms of academic work (e.g., research, administration, education) all create challenges for traditional group-based and/or didactic faculty development. METHODS: The authors engaged in a synthetic narrative review of literature from several unrelated fields: learning technologies, medical education/health professions education, general/higher education. The aim for this review was to synthesize this pre-existing literature to propose a new conceptual model. RESULTS: The authors propose a new conceptual model, the Just-In-Time Learning Loop, to guide the development of online faculty development for just-in-time delivery. CONCLUSIONS: The Just-In-Time Learning Loop is a new conceptual framework that may be of use to those engaging in online, digital learning design. Faculty developers, especially in emergency medicine, can integrate leading concepts from the technology-enhanced learning field (e.g., microlearning, micro-credentialing, badging) to create new types of learning experiences for their end-users.

Tell Me More®: A medical student focused humanistic communication model to enhance student professional identity formation through meaningful patient encounters.

INTRODUCTION: The Tell Me More (TMM)® program provides a template for guided interviews to help providers procure an expansive social history from patients and connect with them as people beyond their illness. (TMM)® may provide a dual benefit: it improves the patient's experience with their healthcare team and the medical students' experience in developing their identity as a physician. Our aim was to characterize the impact of the patient-student conversations in TMM® on the participating medical students through analysis of their written reflections throughout the program. METHODS: Students conducted interviews with hospitalized patients using the TMM® template, Through narrative medicine and individualized posters, patients were able to highlight their unique qualities. RESULTS: Qualitative analyses of 63 journal reflections from 14 students, across 7 hospital settings, identified 6 themes. These included connection, humanism, discovery, impact, privilege, and perspective. CONCLUSION: Reflective practice as a learning pedagogy created an opportunity to enhance the medical students' awareness of empathy and compassion during the TMM® program. Documentation of reflections assured students would process the encounter as a profound learning experience and develop their professional identity formation as a student preparing to become a physician. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: TMM® provides an opportunity for medical students to practice and apply their interpersonal and communication skills through authentic patient encounters.

Just-in-Time Continuing Education: Perceived and Unperceived, Pull and Push Taxonomy.

ABSTRACT: We live in a world where "just-in-time" (JiT) methodologies are increasingly used. Continuing professional development (CPD), including faculty development, has the opportunity to leverage online technologies in a JiT format to further support learner engagement and program sustainability. In this article, the authors propose a model that can serve as a taxonomy for defining and implementing JiT continuing education (JiTCE). The anatomy of JiTCE describes four mechanisms to address CPD needs and delivery procedures: perceived and unperceived, as well as pull and push (PUPP) taxonomy. JiTCE PUPP taxonomy defines four components for designing and developing a program with JiT: on-demand learning, subscription-based learning, performance feedback-driven learning, and data-driven learning. These methods, as backbones, use various online technologies, which offer fundamental support for JiTCE. Delivery systems and technologies are provided as specific examples for JiTCE throughout the article. JiTCE introduces a novel taxonomy to meet continuing education needs and provides an organized approach to design and deploy programming in a sustainable way. Online technologies are evolving everyday and are an indispensable part of both clinical practice and medical education. Pull-push and perceived-unperceived axes can help guide new opportunities for instructional designers and curriculum developers to leverage best practices to align with CPD offerings, which include cutting-edge technologies.

Who Speaks First? Promoting Senior Resident Autonomy on Family-Centered Rounds: A QI Initiative.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Graduated autonomy is fundamental as trainees transition to independent practice. Family-centered rounds (FCR), the leading model of inpatient rounding in pediatrics, is an opportunity for trainees to demonstrate their competence in leading a health care team, which is an entrustable professional activity for all pediatric residents. At our institution, senior residents (SRs) at baseline performed at a novice level on the basis of the Senior Resident Empowerment Actions 21 (SREA-21), a validated tool that is used to assess SR autonomy during FCR. Our objective for this study was to increase the median percentage of SREA-21 domains in which SRs perform at a competent level from 38% to 75% within 6 months. METHODS: Researchers observed 4 FCR encounters weekly and calculated SREA-21 scores after 2 weeks on the basis of actions promoting SR autonomy performed by the SR-hospitalist dyad. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of SREA-21 domains in which the SR achieved a competent score on the SREA-21. We used the model for improvement to identify key drivers and test proposed interventions using serial plan-do-study-act cycles. Interventions included creation of unified inpatient SR expectations, introduction of a SR-hospitalist pre-FCR huddle, auditing of FCR interruptions, and direct feedback to the SR-hospitalist dyad after FCR. Run charts were used to track SR and hospitalist scores on the SREA-21. RESULTS: After multiple plan-do-study-act cycles, there was special cause improvement with a desirable shift upward in the centerline to 100%, which correlated with the project's interventions and surpassed our goal. CONCLUSIONS: Using quality improvement methodology, we improved SR autonomy during FCR, as measured by the SREA-21.

Student Perception of Case-based Teaching by Near-Peers and Faculty during the Internal Medicine Clerkship: A Noninferiority Study.

INTRODUCTION: Third-year medical students traditionally receive their didactic or small group teaching sessions from clinical faculty during clerkship rotations. Near-peer teaching is increasingly recognized as an acceptable method for teaching, however most near-peer teaching takes place during the pre-clinical curriculum. We sought to determine if fourth year medical students were noninferior to faculty in facilitating small group discussions during clerkship rotations. METHODS: Seventy-five third-year medical students participated in a small group session focused on rheumatologic diseases during their internal medicine clerkship rotation. Students were taught by fourth-year medical students who self-selected to participate as near-peer teachers at 1 clinical site (near-peers, N = 36) and by clinical faculty at another site (N = 39). At the end of the session, third-year medical students completed a survey evaluating teacher performance and effectiveness. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the 2 groups on each of the 17 survey items assessing teacher performance, the total teaching performance score, and the teaching effectiveness rating (all P-values >.05). A mean between-group difference of 2% in favor of the near-peers indicated noninferiority of the near-peer teachers compared with faculty teachers on the total teaching performance score. An absolute difference of 14% in favor of the near-peers indicated noninferiority of the near-peer teachers compared with faculty teachers on the teaching effectiveness score. Near-peer teachers reported several benefits, including improving their own medical knowledge and skills as a future educator. DISCUSSION: Our data supports the noninferiority of the perceived performance and effectiveness of near-peer teachers compared to faculty teachers in the clerkship setting. Adding near-peer teachers to the clerkship setting is feasible and can be beneficial to all stakeholders.

Collaborative writing for clinical educators: recommendations from a community of scholars.

Clinical educators who wish to engage in scholarship in health professions' education (HPE), are ideally poised at the intersection of educational theories and their application to educational practice. However, the burden of clinical practice does not often allow the time and space for scholarly writing. Being part of a collaborative writing team, incorporating members with varying levels of expertise, from different health care professions, and at different stages of their career, can provide valuable opportunities for clinicians to contribute to scholarship. Such collaborations can also bridge the gap between scholarship and educational practice in clinical settings. In this paper, we emphasise the benefits of collaborative writing, describe challenges for clinical educators in starting writing projects, and identify potential solutions. We outline a systematic approach to collaborative writing grounded in literature and our own experiences. Three key concepts underpin the provided recommendations: types and standards for scholarship, leadership and followership and communities of practice. Psychological safety, mentoring and a growth mindset are emphasised as integral to successful team projects. Finally, we argue that collaborative writing groups in clinical education can be powerful communities of practice where the overall contribution to the field can be greater than the sum of its parts.

Implementation of a Multi-Modal Palliative Care Curriculum for Pediatric Residents.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a new multi-modal pediatric palliative care curriculum. We sought to determine the effect on comfort in palliative care, knowledge, and change in behavior by utilizing these skills with patients, and determine which modalities were most effective for residents. STUDY DESIGN: 25 pediatric residents were exposed to the 4-part curriculum. The modalities utilized in this curriculum included didactics, role-play, videos, case-discussion, small group activities, simulation, poetry and reflection. RESULTS: The pediatric residents self-reported an increase in comfort and knowledge of the components of pediatric palliative care after this curriculum. In addition, 74% of residents were able to identify a patient experience in which a component of the palliative care curriculum was utilized directly in patient care. The effectiveness of techniques utilized in this multimodal curriculum varied; residents reported that the poetry and reflection components were less effective, as compared with the role-play, simulation and other active learning components. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a multi-modal palliative care curriculum was effective in increasing knowledge in palliative care, comfort in breaking bad news, and caring for patients with palliative care needs. This can be translated into a change in behavior to utilize these new skills in the care of various patients in pediatrics. Among the various techniques used to teach this curriculum, residents reported that the techniques that most incorporated active learning and were directly applicable to the professional role of the resident were rated most valuable. This curriculum was well received, feasible and effective for pediatric residents.

Implementation of an Interprofessional Nutrition Workshop to Integrate Nutrition Education into a Preclinical Medical School Curriculum.

Objective: The patient-physician encounter provides an ideal opportunity to assess a patient's dietary history and its impact on total health. However, nutrition assessments and counseling in physician-patient encounters is often lacking. Insufficient nutrition education during medical school may lead to insecurity in assessing and counseling patients.Methods: Physicians and registered dietitians (RD) co-developed and co-facilitated a nutrition workshop for first-year medical students. Goals included increasing recognition of nutrition's impact on health and promoting student confidence and skills when attaining a nutrition history, assessing risk factors, and advising.Results: Seventy percent of students attested to having "sufficient" knowledge to counsel a patient on nutrition after the session compared to 38% before (Z= -4.46, p < 0.001). Sixty eight percent felt comfortable completing a nutritional assessment after the session compared to 35% before (Z= -4.30, p < 0.001). Sixty-three percent felt confident in advising patients about nutrition after the session compared to 32% before (Z= -4.20, p < 0.001). Students also significantly outperformed a control cohort on a nutrition-related component of an Objective Standardized Clinical Examination.Conclusions: Clinical nutrition education can be successfully integrated into the medical school curriculum as early as the first year. Interprofessional collaboration with RDs provided evidence-based content and authentic clinical experience in both the development of the workshop and in facilitating student discussion.

A novel longitudinal interprofessional ambulatory training practice: the improving patient access care and cost through training (IMPACcT) clinic.

Few graduating health professionals choose primary care. Trainees satisfied with continuity ambulatory experiences are more likely to pursue primary care. The authors developed a longitudinal interprofessional ambulatory training program to improve team-based care and encourage primary care careers. The Improving Patient Access Care and cost through Training (IMPACcT) clinic, launched in 2016, includes physician, physician assistant, pharmacy, and psychology trainees. Residents, faculty, and interprofessional trainees complete "on-service" weeks together. Co-located administrative team members coordinate care and lead team "huddles." Interprofessional signout facilitates patient follow-up. The initial evaluation included process and quality indicators compared to the traditional resident practice. Learners reported increased perceived competence in interprofessional communication and teamwork after completing their training. Clinical quality outcomes suggested improved provider continuity and arrival rate compared to traditional resident practice (56.5% vs. 32.9%; 66.3% vs. 62.2%, p < .01). Patient satisfaction was higher in the IMPACcT clinic in the areas of coordinated care and team functioning. Ten of eighteen physician graduates in the program chose further training in primary care compared to 20 of 150 graduates not in the program (55.6% vs. 13.3%, p < .01). Implementing a longitudinal team-based ambulatory interprofessional training practice was associated with improved continuity of care and improved patient satisfaction indicators.

Twelve tips for developing a global community of scholars in health professions education.

Scholarship in Health Professions Education is not just original research, it also includes study of educational processes, and application of new knowledge to practice. The pathways to successful scholarship are not always clear to novice educators. In this article, we describe strategies to establish a Community of Scholars (CoS), where more experienced and senior members guide junior members in scholarship to advance the field. Drawing on Lave and Wenger's concepts of Communities of Practice (CoP), we describe twelve practical tips, which include generation of a shared vision, formation of a global community of scholars, engagement in scholarly initiatives, and development of a professional identity, categorised under three major steps: establish, grow, and sustain the community. The tips embrace inclusivity for diverse cultural contexts which further provide opportunities for Health Professions Educators, interested in forming communities of practice, to work on scholarly outputs and add value to the professional arena.